![]() ![]() Actually, becaue my TV locks the picture into wide mode when displaying any signal 480p or higher, I need the game to support widescreen if I don't want to watch fat people. However, I'm far more likely to just buy it if it has HD content.And considering that all TVs will have HD support by 2007, and most by 2005 by government mandate, supporting HD res isn't a bad idea.I care more about native widescreen support than HD res. Unless it was specifically recommended by GESC users, I'd probably put it down without HD support. Or, to phrase it a different way, "No chance in hell."When I see a box for an XBox game that looks interesting, I immediately check the back to see if it supports HDTV res. Quote:Originally posted by Semi On:quote:You explain to game publishers how investing all that time and effort, for the roughly 18 people in the whole world who own (1) a 1080i/720p capable HDTV, (2) a PS2, (3) PS2 component video cables, and (4) have even the slightest interest in playing PS2 games in ProScan, how this would benefit their bottom line. which is the only reason I know this crap in the first place.PC Gaming++- View image here: - Eric. Pfft, I don't even play games on my PS2 - it's for QCast. Or, to phrase it a different way, "No chance in hell."If it's high-resolution inventory screens you're after, may I kindly welcome you to the world of PC games. You explain to game publishers how investing all that time and effort, for the roughly 18 people in the whole world who own (1) a 1080i/720p capable HDTV, (2) a PS2, (3) PS2 component video cables, and (4) have even the slightest interest in playing PS2 games in ProScan, how this would benefit their bottom line. Quote:I think it would be interesting for some RPG's to use 1080i for inventory/char screens that could benefit from the highres, and switch back to 480p for 3D.Or for 2D/sidescrollers.Hmm.- Eric. I was referring to games, but point noted. Ever play with a PS2 Linux kit? It's actually pretty usable for normal UI stuff at that resolution. Smith:The PS2 can output in 1080i/720p easily. Ever play with a PS2 Linux kit? It's actually pretty usable for normal UI stuff at that resolution.I think it would be interesting for some RPG's to use 1080i for inventory/char screens that could benefit from the highres, and switch back to 480p for 3D.Or for 2D/sidescrollers.Hmm.- Eric. So, um, the PS2 will never, ever be able to output in 720p/1080i. Well, technically the GF FX5200 is a DX9 card, but who's counting? - View image here: -While the GS can technically output in 720p/1080i, there's this slight issue of the (infamous) 4MB of VRAM not being able to hold a single framebuffer of that resolution, and most games use double and triple buffering. It's not supported (AFAIK) in any games, but the GS absolutely CAN output in those modes.- Eric. Happy to speak with someone at Intuit to go through all of the specific problems with QBO when compared to QBD.Quote:Originally posted by The Faceless Rebel: I really hope that Intuit reverses this decision. But I will not be advising any of my clients who are currently paying monthly subscriptions for QBD to transfer to QBO. I for one would be delighted to pay a (increased) monthly subscription if you either kept QBD running or even put QBD product online. The QBO product is significantly inferior to QBD which is the number one product in the market. I have a small handful of clients who operate on QBO but the vast majority of the 250 companies that we act for are on QBD due to the lack of functionality, flexibility and speed when operating on QBO. However, I have been using QBD for 20 years. I understand that you want to migrate everyone to QBO (I presume this is a purely financial decision and respect that). I am not sure why this decision has been taken by Intuit but I am absolutely mortified by what I have read this morning. ![]() It continues to only offer a one size fits all subscription for every company regardless of size or volume of activity. When it comes to QB Online, Intuit has consistently failed to address the reality that there are many companies in existence that exist for specific limited purposes with small volumes of transactions. I tried to locate a for purchase version last year but couldn't find one available anywhere. If QB Desktop 2021 is available for purchase for a flat fee, then I would appreciate being told where I can get it. It's important that Intuit clarify this to avoid mis-leading many of its Desktop users who think they can continue using QB Desktop unsupported. Does this mean that on 1st February 2023 I can no longer use QB desktop? I have Quickbooks Desktop 2021 which as far as I could establish is only available on a subscription basis, without a subscription one cannot log on. ![]() "With the discontinuation in 2023, you can still use the app if you have purchased a not subscription-based". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |